C64anabalt Mac OS

1. C64anabalt Mac Os X
2. C64anabalt Mac Os Catalina
3. C64anabalt Mac Os Pro
4. C64anabalt Mac Os Download

In Mac OS 9 and earlier versions of Mac OS X, Software Update was a standalone tool. The program was part of the CoreServices in OS X. It could automatically inform users of new updates (with new features and bug and security fixes) to the operating system, applications, device drivers, and firmware. All updates required the user to enter their. Mac OS X & macOS names. As you can see from the list above, with the exception of the first OS X beta, all versions of the Mac operating system from 2001 to 2012 were all named after big cats. Mac OS 8 is an operating system that was released by Apple Computer, Inc. On July 26, 1997. It includes the largest overhaul of the classic Mac OS experience since the release of System 7, approximately six years before.It emphasizes color more than prior versions. Released over a series of updates, Mac OS 8 represents an incremental integration of many of the technologies which had been. The maximum version of Mac OS X, OS X, or macOS supported by each G3 and later Mac follows. For complete specs on a particular system, click the name of the Mac. For all Macs that are compatible with a specifc maximum supported version of Mac OS X - courtesy of EveryMac.com's Ultimate Mac Sort - click the OS of interest.

Before you begin to update your code, you should familiarize yourself with the document Mac Technology Overview. After reading that document, the first thing you should do is compile your code with the -Wall compiler flag and fix any warnings that occur. In particular, make sure that all function prototypes are in scope, because out-of-scope prototypes can hide many subtle portability problems.

At a high level, to make your code 64-bit clean, you must do the following:

Process states in OS theory vs in Linux What is the difference between the bIII and III chord in a minor scale? Why is particular solution zero for an impulse excitation signal? Need help to identify this Lego set - white, gold, grey, blue, and earth tones 1950s short story with people recruited to fight in far future war.

• Avoid assigning 64-bit long integers to 32-bit integers.

• Avoid assigning 64-bit pointers to 32-bit integers.

• Fix alignment issues caused by changes in data type sizes.

• Avoid pointer and long integer truncation during arithmetic operations.

General Programming Tips

This section contains some general tips for making your code 64-bit clean.

Update architecture-specific code. If your software contains any architecture-specific code, you must either add extra code for each additional architecture or modify your preprocessor directives so that the same code is included for multiple supported architectures.

Unless you are including inline assembly language code, you should generally test for the presence of architecture-neutral macros such as __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ or __LP64__ rather than testing for a specific processor architecture.

The macro __LP64__ can be used to test for LP64 compilation in an architecture-independent way. For example:

For code that is truly architecture-specific (such as assembly language code), you should continue to use architecture-specific tests. Be aware, however, that when compiling for a 64-bit architecture, code wrapped in a test for a 32-bit architecture is not compiled into the executable.

For example, code wrapped with the #ifdef __i386__ directive will not be included when compiling for the x86_64 architecture. The following listing (Listing 3-1) gives examples of how to write tests for various architectures.

Listing 3-1 Architecture definition changes

Code that looks for only the __ppc__ or __i386__ definition will break if you compile for the related 64-bit architecture.

For code specific to OS X (non-cross-platform), the TargetConditionals.h header also provides macro support for architecture-specific code. For example:

Avoid casting pointers to non pointers. You should generally avoid casting a pointer to a non-pointer type for any reason (particularly when performing address arithmetic). Alternatives are described in Avoiding Pointer-to-Integer Conversion.

Update assembly code. Any assembly code needs to be rewritten because 64-bit Intel assembly language is significantly different from its 32-bit counterpart. For more information, see Porting Assembly Language Code.

Any assembly code that directly deals with the structure of the stack (as opposed to simply using pointers to variables on the stack) must be modified to work in a 64-bit environment. For more information, see OS X ABI Mach-O File Format Reference.

Fix format strings. Print functions such as printf can be tricky when writing code to support 32-bit and 64-bit platforms because of the change in the sizes of pointers. To solve this problem for pointer-sized integers (uintptr_t) and other standard types, various macros exist in the inttypes.h header file.

The format strings for various data types are described in Table 3-1. These additional types, listed in the inttypes.h header file, are described in Table 3-2.

For example, to print an intptr_t variable (a pointer-sized integer) and a pointer, you write code similar to that in Listing 3-2.

Listing 3-2 Architecture-independent printing

Data Type and Alignment Tips

Here are a few tips to help you avoid problems stemming from changes to data type size and alignment.

Be careful when mixing integers and long integers. The size and alignment of long integers and pointers have changed from 32-bit to 64-bit.

For the most part, if you always use the sizeof function when allocating data structures and avoid assigning pointers to non-pointer types, the size and alignment of pointers should not affect your code, because structures containing pointer members are generally not written to disk or sent across networks between 32-bit and 64-bit applications. This is something to consider when writing kernel extensions that read structures passed in from applications, however.

If you frequently move data between variables of type int and long, the change in the size of long can cause problems. You will see various related problems throughout this section.

Be sure to control alignment of shared data. The alignment of long long (64-bit) integers has changed from 32-bit to 64-bit. This alignment change can pose a problem when you are exchanging data between 32-bit and 64-bit code.

In Listing 3-3, the alignment changes even though the data types are the same size.

Listing 3-3 Alignment of long long integers in structures

When this code is compiled with a 32-bit compiler, the variable bar begins 12 bytes from the start of the structure. When the same code is compiled with a 64-bit compiler, the variable bar begins 16 bytes from the start of the structure, and a 4-byte pad is added after foo2.

If you must maintain data structure compatibility, to allow a single data structure to be shared, you can use a pragma to force packed alignment mode for each structure, as needed. Then add appropriate pad bytes (if necessary) to obtain the desired alignment. An example is shown in Listing 3-4.

If backwards compatibility with existing structures is not important, you should reorder the data structure so that the largest fields are at the beginning of the structure. That way, the 8-byte fields begin at offset 0 and thus are aligned on 8-byte boundaries without the need to add an alignment pragma.

Listing 3-4 Using pragmas to control alignment

You should use this option only when absolutely necessary, because there is a performance penalty for misaligned accesses.

Use sizeof with malloc. Since pointers and long integers are no longer 4 bytes long, never call malloc with an explicit size (for example, malloc(4)) to allocate space for them. Always use sizeof to obtain the correct size.

Never assume you know the size of any structure (containing a pointer or otherwise); always use sizeof to find out for sure. To avoid future portability problems, search your code for any instance of malloc that isn't followed by sizeof. The grep command and regular expressions are your friend, though using Find in the Xcode Edit menu can do the job.

64-bit sizeof returns size_t. Note that sizeof returns an integer of type size_t. Because the size of size_t has changed to 64 bits, do not pass the value to a function in a parameter of size int (unless you are certain that the size cannot be that large). If you do, truncation will occur.

Use explicit (fixed-width) C99 types. You should use explicit types where possible. For example, types with names like int32_t and uint32_t will always be a 32-bit quantity, regardless of future architectural changes.

Watch for conversion errors. Conversion of shorter types to 64-bit longs may yield unexpected results in certain cases. Be sure to read Sign Extension Rules for C and C-derived Languages if you are seeing unexpected values from math that mixes int and long variables.

Use 64-bit types for pointer arithmetic results. Because the size of pointers is a 64-bit value, the result of pointer arithmetic is also a 64-bit value. You should always store these values in a variable of type ptrdiff_t to ensure that the variable is sized appropriately.

Avoid truncating file positions and offsets. Although file operations have always used 64-bit positions and offsets, you should still check for errors in their use. Errors will become more and more important as common file sizes grow. Use fpos_t for file position and off_t for file offset.

Be careful with variable argument lists. Variable argument lists (varargs) do not provide type information for the arguments, and the arguments are not promoted to larger types automatically. If you need to distinguish between different incoming data types, you are expected to use a format string or other similar mechanism to provide that information to the varargs function. If the calling function does not correctly provide that information (or if the varargs function does not interpret it correctly), you will get incorrect results.

In particular, if your varargs function expects a long type and you pass in a 32-bit value, the varargs function will contain 32 bits of data and 32 bits of garbage from the next argument (which you will lose as a result). Likewise, if your varargs function is expecting an int type and you pass in a long, you will get only half of the data, and the rest will incorrectly appear in the argument that follows.

For example, if you use incorrect printf format strings, you will get incorrect behavior. Some examples of these format string mistakes are shown in General Programming Tips.

Avoiding Pointer-to-Integer Conversion

You should generally avoid casting a pointer to a non-pointer type for any reason. If possible, rewrite any code that uses these casts, either by changing the data types or by replacing address arithmetic with pointer arithmetic. For example, the following code:

results in pointer truncation. Because the resulting value would be correct for sufficiently small pointers, these bugs can be difficult to find. Instead, this code can be replaced with:

(Of course, this example is somewhat contrived, and such use of pointers is relatively uncommon.)

A more common problem is storing a pointer temporarily in a variable of type int. In most cases, the compiler will warn you that a pointer is being assigned to an integer of a different size. However, in a few cases, code containing such an assignment will compile without warning. For example, if the code stores the values in a variable of type long and then later copies it to an integer, the pointer itself is not directly truncated, so the compiler may not generate a warning. These problems are particularly hard to spot.

Finally, a common problem is the need to offset a pointer by a specific number of bytes. Instead of casting to an integer and using integer math, you should cast the pointer to a byte-width pointer type such as char * or uint8_t *. After you do this, the pointer will behave like an integer for arithmetic purposes. For example:

can be rewritten as: The ball (itch) (sanamac) mac os.

By avoiding assignment of pointers to any non-pointer type, you avoid almost all pointer-related problems, because pointers are rarely stored or exchanged between 32-bit and 64-bit processes. In a few situations, however, there may be no easy way to avoid address-to-integer conversions. The uintptr_t type exists for these edge cases.

Note: Casting 64-bit pointers to integer types is also required when passing a pointer via a Mach port. In these cases, use the caddr_t type.

Working with Bits and Bitmasks

When working with bits and masks with 64-bit values, you must be careful to avoid getting 32-bit values inadvertently. Here are some tips to help you:

Shift carefully. If you are shifting through the bits stored in a variable of type long, don't assume that the variable is of a particular length. Instead, use the value LONG_BIT to determine the number of bits in a long. The result of a shift that exceeds the length of a variable is architecture-dependent.

Use inverted masks if needed. Be careful when using bit masks with variables of type long, because the width differs between 32-bit and 64-bit architectures. There are two ways to create a mask, depending on whether you want the mask to be zero-extended or one-extended:

• If you want the mask value to contain zeros in the upper 32 bits on a 64-bit architecture, the usual fixed-width mask will work as expected, because it will be extended in an unsigned fashion to a 64-bit quantity.

• If you want the mask value to contain ones in the upper bits, however, you should write the mask as the bitwise inverse of its inverse, as shown in Listing 3-5.

Listing 3-5 Using an inverted mask for sign extension

In the code, note that the upper bits in the mask are filled with ones in the 64-bit case.

Tools Tips

Here are some tips to help you use the compiler more effectively in transitioning your code to 64-bit:

• If data is being inadvertently truncated, to help you find the source, try turning on additional compiler warnings.

• In 64-bit-capable versions of GCC (4.0 and later), the size of a long double will be 128 bits instead of 64 bits. This change is not limited to code compiled as a 64-bit executable, but it is a toolchain change you should be aware of.

You can find detailed tips and information about 64-bit tools changes in Compiling 64-Bit Code.

Alignment Pragmas

Occasionally, developers use alignment pragmas to change the way that data structures are laid out in memory. They usually do this for backward compatibility. In many cases, Apple added pragmas to maintain data structure compatibility between 68K-based and PowerPC-based code running on the same machine under Mac OS 9 and earlier. OS X retained these alignment overrides to maintain binary compatibility with existing Carbon data structures between Mac OS 9 and OS X.

There is a performance cost associated with pragmas, however; memory accesses to unaligned data fields result in a performance penalty. Because there are no existing 64-bit OS X GUI applications with which to be compatible, it is not necessary to preserve binary compatibility for these data structures in 64-bit applications. Thus, to improve overall performance, when compiling 64-bit executables, the OS X version of GCC ignores requests for mac68k alignment.

If you are using this pragma only to access Apple data structures, you should not need to make any code changes to your code. When compiling 64-bit code, the compiler ignores the pragmas and your code works correctly. If, however, you currently use the mac68k alignment pragma in your own data structures that will be shared between 32-bit and 64-bit versions of your application (or if you use the mac68k pragma for a data structure that corresponds with the register layout of a physical device), you must rewrite the data structure to use a packed alignment and pad the structure appropriately.

With the exception of Altivec data types, the following code is equivalent to mac68k alignment:

Similarly, with the exception of some vector data types, the following code is equivalent to the standard 32-bit alignment:

Sign Extension Rules for C and C-derived Languages

C and similar languages use a set of sign extension rules to determine whether to treat the top bit in an integer as a sign bit when the value is assigned to a variable of larger width. The sign extension rules are as follows:

1. The sum of a signed value and an unsigned value of the same size is an unsigned value.

2. Any promotion always results in a signed type unless a signed type cannot hold all values of the original type (that is, unless the resulting type is the same size as the original type).

3. Unsigned values are zero extended (not sign extended) when promoted to a larger type.

4. Signed values are always sign extended when promoted to a larger type, even if the resulting type is unsigned.

5. Constants (unless modified by a suffix, such as 0x8L) are treated as the smallest size that will hold the value. Numbers written in hexadecimal may be treated by the compiler as signed and unsigned int, long, and long long types. Decimal numbers will always be treated as signed types.

Listing 3-6 shows an example of unexpected behavior resulting from these rules along with an accompanying explanation.

Listing 3-6 Sign extension example 1

Problem: When this code is executed on a 32-bit architecture, the result is -1 (0xffffffff). When the code is run on a 64-bit architecture, the result is 4294967295 (0x00000000ffffffff), which is probably not what you were expecting.

Cause: Why does this happen? First, the two numbers are added. A signed value plus an unsigned value results in an unsigned value (rule 1). Next, that value is promoted to a larger type. This promotion does not cause sign extension (rule 2).

Solution: To fix this problem in a 32-bit-compatible way, cast b to long. This cast forces the non-sign-extended promotion of b to a 64-bit type prior to the addition, thus forcing the signed integer to be promoted (in a signed fashion) to match. With that change, the result is the expected -1.

Listing 3-7 shows a related example with an accompanying explanation.

Listing 3-7 Sign extension example 2

Problem: The expected result (and the result from a 32-bit executable) is 0x80000000. The result generated by a 64-bit executable, however, is 0xffffffff80000000.

Cause: Why is this sign extended? First, when the shift operator is invoked, the variable a is promoted to a variable of type int. Because all values of a short can fit into a signed int, the result of this promotion is signed (rule 3).

Second when the shift completed, the result was stored into a long. Thus, the 32-bit signed value represented by (a << 31) was sign extended (rule 4) when it was promoted to a 64-bit value (even though the resulting type is unsigned).

Solution: To fix this problem, you should cast the initial value to a long prior to the shift. Thus, the short will be promoted only once—this time, to a 64-bit type (at least when compiled as a 64-bit executable).

Velocity Engine and SSE Alignment Tips

Although the SSE and Velocity Engine C and assembly language interfaces have not changed for 64-bit, if you are using these technologies, you should review any code that attempts to align pointers to 16-byte addresses for processing.

For example, the following code contains two errors:

First, the pointer is cast to an int value, which results in truncation. Even after this problem is fixed, however, the pointer will still be truncated because the constant value 0xFFFFFFF0 is not a 64-bit value.

Instead, this code should be written as:

Porting Assembly Language Code

This section describes some of the issues involved in porting assembly language code to a 64-bit application. On the Intel architecture, in addition to the issues described in this section, you must considerably modify any assembly language code that deals with the stack directly, because the 64-bit ABI differs significantly from the 32-bit ABI. The subject of stack frames is beyond the scope of this section. For more information, see OS X ABI Mach-O File Format Reference.

On Intel-based Macintosh computers, 64-bit code uses the Intel 64 (formerly EM64T) extensions to the Intel assembly language ISA. This section summarizes the differences between Intel 64 code and IA32 code in terms of their impact on registers and instruction sets.

Note: The Intel 64 architecture, otherwise known as x86-64, should not be confused with the IA64 architecture. The IA64 architecture, short for Intel Architecture 64, is the architecture used by Itanium processors. Despite their similar names, the Intel 64 Architecture is not related to the Itanium (IA64) architecture.

Register Changes

The 64-bit registers on Intel have different names than their 32-bit counterparts do. In addition, there are more of them. These register names are listed in Table 3-3.

C64anabalt Mac Os X

All of the new registers (R8 through R15) added in the Intel 64 architecture instruction set can also be accessed as 32-bit, 16-bit, and 8-bit registers. For example, register R8 can be addressed in the following ways:

Note: When you assign a value to the 32-bit version of these registers, the value is automatically zero extended to fill the corresponding 64-bit register. To sign extend during assignment, use the movsx instruction instead.

In addition to adding general-purpose registers, the Intel 64 Architecture instruction set has eight additional vector registers. In the IA32 instruction set, the vector registers are numbered XMM0 through XMM7. The Intel 64 Architecture instruction set extends this by adding XMM8 through XMM15.

Instruction Changes

Most IA32 instructions can take 64-bit arguments. All IA32 instruction set extensions up through SSE3 are included as part of the Intel 64 Architecture. In addition, a number of new instructions have been added.

A complete list of these changes is beyond the scope of this document. For information on these changes, see the links in For More Information.

For More Information

For more information on porting and optimizing Intel assembly language code for 64-bit, you should also read:

Use inverted masks if needed. Be careful when using bit masks with variables of type long, because the width differs between 32-bit and 64-bit architectures. There are two ways to create a mask, depending on whether you want the mask to be zero-extended or one-extended:

• If you want the mask value to contain zeros in the upper 32 bits on a 64-bit architecture, the usual fixed-width mask will work as expected, because it will be extended in an unsigned fashion to a 64-bit quantity.

• If you want the mask value to contain ones in the upper bits, however, you should write the mask as the bitwise inverse of its inverse, as shown in Listing 3-5.

Listing 3-5 Using an inverted mask for sign extension

In the code, note that the upper bits in the mask are filled with ones in the 64-bit case.

Tools Tips

Here are some tips to help you use the compiler more effectively in transitioning your code to 64-bit:

• If data is being inadvertently truncated, to help you find the source, try turning on additional compiler warnings.

• In 64-bit-capable versions of GCC (4.0 and later), the size of a long double will be 128 bits instead of 64 bits. This change is not limited to code compiled as a 64-bit executable, but it is a toolchain change you should be aware of.

You can find detailed tips and information about 64-bit tools changes in Compiling 64-Bit Code.

Alignment Pragmas

Occasionally, developers use alignment pragmas to change the way that data structures are laid out in memory. They usually do this for backward compatibility. In many cases, Apple added pragmas to maintain data structure compatibility between 68K-based and PowerPC-based code running on the same machine under Mac OS 9 and earlier. OS X retained these alignment overrides to maintain binary compatibility with existing Carbon data structures between Mac OS 9 and OS X.

There is a performance cost associated with pragmas, however; memory accesses to unaligned data fields result in a performance penalty. Because there are no existing 64-bit OS X GUI applications with which to be compatible, it is not necessary to preserve binary compatibility for these data structures in 64-bit applications. Thus, to improve overall performance, when compiling 64-bit executables, the OS X version of GCC ignores requests for mac68k alignment.

If you are using this pragma only to access Apple data structures, you should not need to make any code changes to your code. When compiling 64-bit code, the compiler ignores the pragmas and your code works correctly. If, however, you currently use the mac68k alignment pragma in your own data structures that will be shared between 32-bit and 64-bit versions of your application (or if you use the mac68k pragma for a data structure that corresponds with the register layout of a physical device), you must rewrite the data structure to use a packed alignment and pad the structure appropriately.

With the exception of Altivec data types, the following code is equivalent to mac68k alignment:

Similarly, with the exception of some vector data types, the following code is equivalent to the standard 32-bit alignment:

Sign Extension Rules for C and C-derived Languages

C and similar languages use a set of sign extension rules to determine whether to treat the top bit in an integer as a sign bit when the value is assigned to a variable of larger width. The sign extension rules are as follows:

1. The sum of a signed value and an unsigned value of the same size is an unsigned value.

2. Any promotion always results in a signed type unless a signed type cannot hold all values of the original type (that is, unless the resulting type is the same size as the original type).

3. Unsigned values are zero extended (not sign extended) when promoted to a larger type.

4. Signed values are always sign extended when promoted to a larger type, even if the resulting type is unsigned.

5. Constants (unless modified by a suffix, such as 0x8L) are treated as the smallest size that will hold the value. Numbers written in hexadecimal may be treated by the compiler as signed and unsigned int, long, and long long types. Decimal numbers will always be treated as signed types.

Listing 3-6 shows an example of unexpected behavior resulting from these rules along with an accompanying explanation.

Listing 3-6 Sign extension example 1

Problem: When this code is executed on a 32-bit architecture, the result is -1 (0xffffffff). When the code is run on a 64-bit architecture, the result is 4294967295 (0x00000000ffffffff), which is probably not what you were expecting.

Cause: Why does this happen? First, the two numbers are added. A signed value plus an unsigned value results in an unsigned value (rule 1). Next, that value is promoted to a larger type. This promotion does not cause sign extension (rule 2).

Solution: To fix this problem in a 32-bit-compatible way, cast b to long. This cast forces the non-sign-extended promotion of b to a 64-bit type prior to the addition, thus forcing the signed integer to be promoted (in a signed fashion) to match. With that change, the result is the expected -1.

Listing 3-7 shows a related example with an accompanying explanation.

Listing 3-7 Sign extension example 2

Problem: The expected result (and the result from a 32-bit executable) is 0x80000000. The result generated by a 64-bit executable, however, is 0xffffffff80000000.

Cause: Why is this sign extended? First, when the shift operator is invoked, the variable a is promoted to a variable of type int. Because all values of a short can fit into a signed int, the result of this promotion is signed (rule 3).

Second when the shift completed, the result was stored into a long. Thus, the 32-bit signed value represented by (a << 31) was sign extended (rule 4) when it was promoted to a 64-bit value (even though the resulting type is unsigned).

Solution: To fix this problem, you should cast the initial value to a long prior to the shift. Thus, the short will be promoted only once—this time, to a 64-bit type (at least when compiled as a 64-bit executable).

Velocity Engine and SSE Alignment Tips

Although the SSE and Velocity Engine C and assembly language interfaces have not changed for 64-bit, if you are using these technologies, you should review any code that attempts to align pointers to 16-byte addresses for processing.

For example, the following code contains two errors:

First, the pointer is cast to an int value, which results in truncation. Even after this problem is fixed, however, the pointer will still be truncated because the constant value 0xFFFFFFF0 is not a 64-bit value.

Instead, this code should be written as:

Porting Assembly Language Code

This section describes some of the issues involved in porting assembly language code to a 64-bit application. On the Intel architecture, in addition to the issues described in this section, you must considerably modify any assembly language code that deals with the stack directly, because the 64-bit ABI differs significantly from the 32-bit ABI. The subject of stack frames is beyond the scope of this section. For more information, see OS X ABI Mach-O File Format Reference.

On Intel-based Macintosh computers, 64-bit code uses the Intel 64 (formerly EM64T) extensions to the Intel assembly language ISA. This section summarizes the differences between Intel 64 code and IA32 code in terms of their impact on registers and instruction sets.

Note: The Intel 64 architecture, otherwise known as x86-64, should not be confused with the IA64 architecture. The IA64 architecture, short for Intel Architecture 64, is the architecture used by Itanium processors. Despite their similar names, the Intel 64 Architecture is not related to the Itanium (IA64) architecture.

Register Changes

The 64-bit registers on Intel have different names than their 32-bit counterparts do. In addition, there are more of them. These register names are listed in Table 3-3.

C64anabalt Mac Os X

All of the new registers (R8 through R15) added in the Intel 64 architecture instruction set can also be accessed as 32-bit, 16-bit, and 8-bit registers. For example, register R8 can be addressed in the following ways:

Note: When you assign a value to the 32-bit version of these registers, the value is automatically zero extended to fill the corresponding 64-bit register. To sign extend during assignment, use the movsx instruction instead.

In addition to adding general-purpose registers, the Intel 64 Architecture instruction set has eight additional vector registers. In the IA32 instruction set, the vector registers are numbered XMM0 through XMM7. The Intel 64 Architecture instruction set extends this by adding XMM8 through XMM15.

Instruction Changes

Most IA32 instructions can take 64-bit arguments. All IA32 instruction set extensions up through SSE3 are included as part of the Intel 64 Architecture. In addition, a number of new instructions have been added.

A complete list of these changes is beyond the scope of this document. For information on these changes, see the links in For More Information.

For More Information

For more information on porting and optimizing Intel assembly language code for 64-bit, you should also read:

• OS X ABI Mach-O File Format Reference—ABI documentation for OS X.

• http://developer.intel.com/technology/intel64/index.htm—Intel 64 Architecture technology page (Intel).

• http://software.intel.com/en-us/parallel/—Intel multicore programming documentation site (Intel).

• http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/porting-to-64-bit-intel-architecture/—Porting to 64-bit Intel architecture (Intel).

• http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/porting-code-to-intel-em64t-based-platforms/—Information about 64-bit optimization. Note that the ABI information at this location is Windows oriented, so those portions do not apply.

• http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/assembly.html—General information on 64-bit Intel assembly (x86-64.org).

Copyright © 2004, 2012 Apple Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Updated: 2012-12-13

C64anabalt Mac Os Catalina

Copyright:
Semi-Secret Software 2009, Paul Koller 2012
Compatibility:
PAL/NTSC (Limited) C64/128/GS
C64anabalt is an official conversion of Adam Atomic & Danny B.'s award winning single-button 2009 indie game Canabalt for the 8-Bit, 64KB RAM, 1Mhz Commodore 64 home computer developed by Paul Koller (Paulko64). This particular version was designed to run from a 16KB cartridge (although there are also tape and disk versions available to download as well).
The game was developed as an entry for the RGCD 16KB Cartridge Game Development Competition (2011), and the name C64anabalt was suggested by Adam Atomic himself. The physics and procedural algorithms are based on those documented in the original game's open source code.
Please note that C64anabalt is compatible with NTSC C64's, but lacks the static parallax background cityscape (the background scrolls instead) and it stutters slightly at high running speeds (due to the NTSC machine having less CPU time available). The game also plays fractionally faster than the PAL version. None of these issues severely affect the play of the game, but it should be noted that the game was coded specifically for PAL machines.

C64anabalt is presented in a modified plastic Universal Game Case complete with custom made foam insert (as with the rest of our deluxe range). The cover art features an illustration by Adam Atomic and the game comes complete with a professionally printed manual and a vinyl RGCD sticker. The 16KB PCB is housed in a dove-grey cartridge shell with a 3D domed C64anabalt label.
Please note that C64anabalt is also available for FREE here as a downloadable .CRT image to use via emulation or on real hardware devices such as the Ultimate 1541-II

by Paul Koller and RGCD

Availability

C64anabalt Mac Os Pro

• Deluxe Packaging

C64anabalt Mac Os Download

Share